Observational Reality Modelling

In comprehending and acknowledging the nature of clarity and observation, it is often a trajectory of aligning internal activity(intuition) with the relatively external interpretation(perception) of events through various realms of wakefulness. 

The flow of memory is dependent on the interim state of mind and natural extension (learning) of cognitive warehouse and formation of initial roadmap for random comprehension. Establishing a relationship between intuition, perception and reality is the ultimate difficulty in addressing the big problem of consciousness.

Modelling is closely linked with the natural imitation of perception-combination and patterned description of an event that is not originally the source of expression. 

The reality of social interaction in human society is a core example of duality in the biological relationship between intuition and perception – and the whole of human civilization is clearly a collection of organized and autonomous activity system of control within individual person – and perception, as it is, is, the only channel to reality as defined by observation and the scientific methods.

The cognitive variation between individual person is characterized by a natural instinct to familiarize the intention and acts of describing the internal processes and the overall social structures of reality. In addressing the forgoing, there is a fundamental ingredient to take as witness of how consciousness is generated in the brain, and this will stand as a rationale for understanding how human perception of language and knowledge are formed.

The usage of words for expression of events and feelings is characterized by human design and desires. In other words, language is human and therefore social; while knowledge on other hand is natural and therefore, absolute. The big question now is, can there be  knowledge without a language system? The answer is, yes! and that is knowledge of origin.

The guiding principle of every phenomenon across anything observable or sensory as the case maybe, is predicated on a system of organized and collective activity which we otherwise call ‘knowledge’ and language is by extension, the social equivalent of knowledge, and that means language in practice, is neutral as far as reality is concerned. Observation is the most common and suitable companion of reality; how then can we familiarize with the nature of reality, since the tool for interpretation of observation is language?

 It is appropriate to conclude that whatever we call reality in this present stage of our civilization is only a modelling which is descriptive of the fact that source and resource of observation is dependent on our senses, and the nature of actual reality is outside of our senses because, it preceded their evolution.

©Innocentanethua