The Reality Clause
The model for rational evaluation of objectivity via-à-vis subjectivity, is somewhat controlled by an historical dilemma of how access to intentional activity varies from moments and intervals.
Generally speaking, individual interpretation of reality is dictated by innate biological rhythms and acquired social values. In an inclusive judgement of essential elements of perception, it will become obvious that the whole of experiences in human nature is under conscious cultivation and progressive monitoring.
In considering the forgoing, there are two key factors to take into account in other to fully understand the ultimate nature of reality - and in analyzing these factors, utmost care has to be taken, so as to avoid unnecessary contradiction in outcome.
First, there is the cultivation of reality. In this, wakefulness is the evidence of objectivity. In wakefulness, consciousness is domicile in the vicinity of control, thus, cultivation of activities in reality can be said to be objective.
Second, there is supervision mode or "progressive monitoring" In this, or what is conventionally known as dream state, consciousness is domicile outside the vicinity of control, thus can be said to be subjective.
Contrasting the two major evidence of reality, how then can we differentiate the role we play in the eventual formation of the total essence of our being, and besides, what is the independent role of these realms of reality?
Mankind has over decades pondered on how our consciousness is created both in the active process of attention(wakefulness) and inactive process of sensation (dream state).
The general consideration of activity formation in everyday living can be likened to construction of intelligent goals by purposeful entities which are similar to the inanimate laws of physics, which only become animate once man has ventured into them to make meaning for the sole interest of maintaining the initial cultivation of reality as discussed earlier.
Ultimately, the foundation of locality can be said to be subjective in totality, because there is no clear-cut way to ascertain the aspects of reality (dream or wakefulness) in which participation is traceable to the conscious decision of our being.
However, it can be concluded that reality is discernible via "a clause" of dual-authority which are interconnected in general essence, and by this, the origin of both the dream state and that of wakefulness is operating hand-in-hand in the same station and has equal relevance.
© Innocentanethua

Comments