Cosmic Parallel Communication
The interactivity of nature and its components is made visible through exchange of essential information between a specific region, and within specie of similar consciousness. In contemplating this, it is obvious that, by extension, individual breed of organisms has unique method of communication and this is in no way social, because the capacity for formation of patterns is as natural as the whole organism itself.
In the history of civilization and human scientific progress, no specie of different biological makeup has had any ideological interaction with one another or proven to engage in moral debate as to what and why all of matter and energy is, and its essence. This cosmic “eventuality” is by no means based on hierarchy - in terms of significance and competence, relative to one specie in particular and every other one in general.
There is a natural assumption that all what exists has origin from a singular source and that implies a variety of distribution in terms of authority and control in all components of nature, this is so because life is not just a single display of events but a complexity of numerous and multiple layers of activities ranging from physical, mental and intuitive.
The unique role communication plays in understanding the core nature of a phenomenon cannot be overemphasized, and this is because the only gateway into mental content, context, structure and anything in nature is via having access to the internal dialogue of such entity.
Inanimate matter communicates with animate matter through laws (natural eventualities), while animate matter communicates with each other through language (definite agreement), communication between organisms and the physical environment is universal, absolute and rigid.
Whenever a law is applied and there is a particular outcome, then a communication has taken place.
However, the controversy is, to what end is the relationship between the laws of nature and their eventual manifestation in reality defined? and how are these laws maintained and recreated to fit into continuous replication whenever they are introduced into everyday human activity?
These controversies are resolved within the general pattern of communication(cosmic), and the challenging issue for adopting this form of communication in “Earth-human” is the counteractive nature of knowledge acquisition which is based on cause-effect scale.
Meanwhile, manifestation of reality follows the opposite direction, i.e. effect precedes cause, technically, all what is displayed in observation is a form of replay of actual reality.
Conclusively, cosmic parallel communication is a vehicle for the actualization of distance possibilities outside our immediate reach and control, and has the capacity to apprehend events before their eventual manifestation in observation.
©Innocentanethua

Comments